Dear Mr., Mrs.,
With this mail I would like to notify you that two of the papers I’m supposed to review are (co-)authored by myself. I think the review system didn’t allow me to indicate this, hence
this mail. It concerns papers 5764 and 5926.
Best regards,
Matthijs
dr. ir. Matthijs Janssen |
Assistant professor; Coordinator
Mission-oriented Innovation Policy Observatory | Innovation Studies, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development | Utrecht University | Vening Meinesz building A
|
Princetonlaan 8a, 3584 CB, Utrecht |
Room 7.04 | P.O. Box 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht | + 31 645990939 | m.j.janssen@uu.nl | www.uu.nl/staff/MJJanssen
Latest report:
Janssen M. (2020), Post-commencement analysis of the
Dutch ‘Mission-oriented Topsector and Innovation Policy’ strategy.
Latest article:
Janssen, M., Torrens, J.C.L., Wesseling, J., Wanzenböck, I., (2021).
The
promises and premises of mission-oriented innovation policy: A reflection and ways forward.
Science and Public Policy.
Van: DRUID21 <druid@druid.dk>
Verzonden: Monday, 14 June 2021 12:54
Aan: Janssen, M.J. (Matthijs) <M.J.Janssen@uu.nl>
Onderwerp: DRUID21: Papers ready for review
DRUID21
Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark
October 18-20, 2021
Email: druid@druid.dk
Website: www.druid.dk
Dear Matthijs Janssen,
Time has now come to select the best papers for oral presentation at the upcoming DRUID21 among the total of 425 papers submitted before the deadline. Papers you recommend for the conference should be both NOVEL and of HIGH QUALITY (more about grading criteria
after logon).
You can find the Call for Papers for DRUID21 here:
https://conference.druid.dk/Druid/?confId=62
You can access the papers assigned to you by logging on here:
http://reviewer.druid.dk/Reviewer/revFeedbackStart.xhtml?c=3x4hxubo7ng1h2i75t
All information provided in your self-declared profile has been used to identify papers that we believe fall within your broader area of competence and expertise. Please notify us immediately if you feel less than totally unbiased towards the assumed author(s)
or content of a specific paper. We also kindly ask you inform us immediately if you notice or suspect - however slightly - any kind of plagiarism, data fabrication or other violations of academic ethics in the paper(s) you are asked to review.
The review process is simple and easy in terms of effort and time required. No written report is requested. Please see the instructions upon logging on above. In order to keep our deadlines, we will need your recommendations to be submitted before July 10.
Thanks once again for agreeing to review a maximum of ten papers for DRUID21. Your assistance is crucial for a successful conference and highly appreciated!
Best wishes
Mark Lorenzen
Director, DRUID
----------------
For future reference please use the following email ID: 72466