Dear Hugo

Thanks for letting us know. This is obviously a mistake made by the submitting authors. We will write them and tell them to remember to anonymize the papers.

If you feel that you can review the papers any way, I would be grateful if you could, to avoid re-assigning them, which demands a matching process.

Thanks for reviewing for DRUID!

All best,
Mark


Mark Lorenzen
Department of Strategy and Innovation, Copenhagen Business School
Director, DRUID
www.cbs.dk/en/staff/mlino
www.druid.dk
Fra: Druid <druid-bounces@aau.dk> på vegne af Hugo Castro Silva via Druid <druid@aau.dk>
Sendt: 7. marts 2023 23:16
Til: druid@druid.dk <druid@druid.dk>
Emne: Re: [Druid] DRUID23: Papers ready for review
 
Dear Mark Lorenzen,

Two of the papers I was given to review have the authors name in the first page. 

I was under the impression the review process was double-blind. I’m fine with reviewing them anyway, but I would like to know how to proceed.

Cheers,
Hugo
On 7 Mar 2023 at 18:31 +0000, DRUID23 <druid@druid.dk>, wrote:
DRUID23
NOVA School of Business and Economics
June 10-June 12, 2023
Email: druid@druid.dk
Website: druid.dk


Dear Hugo Silva,

Time has now come to select the best papers for oral presentation at the upcoming DRUID23 conference among the total of 650 papers submitted before the deadline. Papers you recommend for the conference should be both NOVEL and of HIGH QUALITY (more about grading criteria after logon).

You can find the Call for Papers for DRUID23 here: https://conference.druid.dk/Druid/?confId=66

You can access the papers assigned to you by logging on here:

https://reviewer.druid.dk/Reviewer/revFeedbackStart.xhtml?c=ufm6g94g41rouuddq9e3

All information provided in your self-declared profile has been used to identify papers that we believe fall within your broader area of competence and expertise. Please notify us immediately if you feel less than totally unbiased towards the assumed author(s) or content of a specific paper. We also kindly ask you inform us immediately if you notice or suspect - however slightly - any kind of plagiarism, data fabrication or other violations of academic ethics in the paper(s) you are asked to review.

The review process is simple and easy in terms of effort and time required. No written report is requested. Please see the instructions upon logging on above. In order to keep our deadlines, we will need your recommendations to be submitted before April 1.

Thanks once again for agreeing to review a maximum of ten papers for DRUID23. Your assistance is crucial for a successful conference and highly appreciated!

Best wishes
Mark Lorenzen
Director, DRUID

 

----------------
For future reference please use the following email ID: 98581