?Dear Mark, I signed up as a reviewer with the intention to submit my own paper and attend the conference in june. Unfortunately, I was not able to submit a full paper to the conference and will therefore not be able to attend the conference. My apologies for reaching out so late, but I would like to ask whether it is still possible to withdraw as a reviewer. I understand that it is very difficult to reallocate the papers at this point, but given that I won't be able to benefit from the conference myself and am in the last year of my PhD, I hope it is understandable that I would like to withdraw as a reviewer for this year. My apologies again and best regards, Eline Eline Wijns PhD candidate Department of Organisation, Strategy, & Entrepreneurship e.wijns@maastrichtuniversity.nl<mailto:firstname.lastname@maastrichtuniversity.nl> www.maastrichtuniversity.nl<https://www.maastrichtuniversity.nl/> Twitter<https://twitter.com/ws_eline> | LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/in/eline-wijns/> ________________________________ From: DRUID23 <druid@druid.dk> Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2023 7:31 PM To: Wijns, Eline (OS) Subject: DRUID23: Papers ready for review DRUID23 NOVA School of Business and Economics June 10-June 12, 2023 Email: druid@druid.dk Website: druid.dk Dear Eline Wijns, Time has now come to select the best papers for oral presentation at the upcoming DRUID23 conference among the total of 650 papers submitted before the deadline. Papers you recommend for the conference should be both NOVEL and of HIGH QUALITY (more about grading criteria after logon). You can find the Call for Papers for DRUID23 here: https://conference.druid.dk/Druid/?confId=66 You can access the papers assigned to you by logging on here: https://reviewer.druid.dk/Reviewer/revFeedbackStart.xhtml?c=wa2sr01a0v396alc... All information provided in your self-declared profile has been used to identify papers that we believe fall within your broader area of competence and expertise. Please notify us immediately if you feel less than totally unbiased towards the assumed author(s) or content of a specific paper. We also kindly ask you inform us immediately if you notice or suspect - however slightly - any kind of plagiarism, data fabrication or other violations of academic ethics in the paper(s) you are asked to review. The review process is simple and easy in terms of effort and time required. No written report is requested. Please see the instructions upon logging on above. In order to keep our deadlines, we will need your recommendations to be submitted before April 1. Thanks once again for agreeing to review a maximum of ten papers for DRUID23. Your assistance is crucial for a successful conference and highly appreciated! Best wishes Mark Lorenzen Director, DRUID ---------------- For future reference please use the following email ID: 98668