Dear Mark, It was a great experience to review the papers for DRUID. During the revision process I have realized that most of the papers, I was revising, had no authors on them. Thus, that is probably a DRUID rule, which I did not comply with. I very much apologize that I have submitted my paper without deleting the authorship information. I will keep it in mind for the next year’s submission. Best regards, Katarina From: DRUID23 <druid@druid.dk> Sent: Saturday, April 1, 2023 12:08 AM To: Katarina Zigova <katarina.zigova@business.uzh.ch> Subject: DRUID23: Thanks for the the review! DRUID23 NOVA School of Business and Economics June 10-June 12, 2023 Email: druid@druid.dk<mailto:druid@druid.dk> Website: druid.dk Dear Katarina Zigova , We are most grateful for your effort in assessing all papers you were given to review. The authors are understandably curious to learn the results of the selection process and we are very pleased by the fact that your timely response help us communicate our decision on the date promised in the call for papers. Before then we need to appoint and receive the response from an additional reviewer on all papers where the reviewers differ by more than one grade. With this additional opinion on file we will feel comfortable to make the final decisions and inform the authors. Thanks once again for your reviews. Much appreciated! Best wishes Mark Lorenzen Director, DRUID ---------------- For future reference please use the following email ID: 99280