Dear Mark, This is to inform you that I have finished my reviewing work for the next DRUID conference: a lot of work ! ;-) As you could see, I have refrained from the evaluation of paper 69786 (green and non-green …), as it is a paper from a PhD student of the Program I coordinate at the GSSI: though I detected it immediately, the name of the author was left in the paper :-(. In that respect, please notice that, while I reviewed them without conflicts of interest and in an impartial way, the names of the authors were disclosed in the two papers numbered 69822 (Green coops ...) and 70246 (Catapulting firms ...). Hoping to meet you soon in Lisbon ;-) My best Sandro Sandro Montresor, PhD, MA Full Professor of Applied Economics Gran Sasso Science Institute (GSSI), L'Aquila, Italy Email: sandro.montresor@gssi.it Skype: sandro.montresor Web-GSSI <https://www.gssi.it/people/professors/lectures-social-science-gssi-cities/item/7181-montresor-sandro>, Google-web <https://sites.google.com/site/mon3sandro/> Google-scholar <https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=aR1SajsAAAAJ&hl=it>, Orcid <https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1195-901X>
Il giorno 7 mar 2023, alle ore 19:30, DRUID23 <druid@druid.dk> ha scritto:
DRUID23 NOVA School of Business and Economics June 10-June 12, 2023 Email: druid@druid.dk Website: druid.dk
Dear Sandro Montresor,
Time has now come to select the best papers for oral presentation at the upcoming DRUID23 conference among the total of 650 papers submitted before the deadline. Papers you recommend for the conference should be both NOVEL and of HIGH QUALITY (more about grading criteria after logon).
You can find the Call for Papers for DRUID23 here: https://conference.druid.dk/Druid/?confId=66
You can access the papers assigned to you by logging on here:
https://reviewer.druid.dk/Reviewer/revFeedbackStart.xhtml?c=xaza7m931ocz3hdn...
All information provided in your self-declared profile has been used to identify papers that we believe fall within your broader area of competence and expertise. Please notify us immediately if you feel less than totally unbiased towards the assumed author(s) or content of a specific paper. We also kindly ask you inform us immediately if you notice or suspect - however slightly - any kind of plagiarism, data fabrication or other violations of academic ethics in the paper(s) you are asked to review.
The review process is simple and easy in terms of effort and time required. No written report is requested. Please see the instructions upon logging on above. In order to keep our deadlines, we will need your recommendations to be submitted before April 1.
Thanks once again for agreeing to review a maximum of ten papers for DRUID23. Your assistance is crucial for a successful conference and highly appreciated!
Best wishes Mark Lorenzen Director, DRUID
---------------- For future reference please use the following email ID: 98473