Dear organisers,
I have reviewed all the papers you sent me but one, as I have the suspect of knowing the authors of that paper, which may bias my review. I hope you appreciate that reviewing ten papers is a rather labour intensive work.
Let me take the opportunity to say that sending a reminder on the day of the deadline (especially if this falls on a weekend) is not a very effective way to make sure people will reply on time. I would kindly suggest to send the reminder at least a week before
the deadline.
My best wishes,
Raffaele Danna
--
Raffaele Danna
Postdoctoral Research Fellow in Economics, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies
PhD in History, University of Cambridge, Pembroke College
From: DRUID23 <druid@druid.dk>
Sent: 01 April 2023 09:48
To: Raffaele Danna <raffaele.danna@santannapisa.it>
Subject: DRUID23: Reviewer Reminder
DRUID23
NOVA School of Business and Economics
June 10-June 12, 2023
Email: druid@druid.dk
Website: druid.dk
Dear Raffaele Danna,
Please allow us to remind you of the April 1. deadline for the assessments of the papers you kindly accepted to conduct for DRUID23.
As always, DRUID strives to provide decisions without delays to all submitting authors, and your contribution is invaluable to keeping the process on track. Please logon to your reviewer profile (details and instructions in the original reviewer mail, copied
below) and complete the assessments.
Thanks once again for agreeing to reviewing for DRUID23. Your assistance is crucial for a successful conference and highly appreciated!
Best wishes
Mark Lorenzen
Director, DRUID
_________
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
DRUID23
NOVA School of Business and Economics
June 10-June 12, 2023
Email: druid@druid.dk
Website: druid.dk
Dear Raffaele Danna,
Time has now come to select the best papers for oral presentation at the upcoming DRUID23 conference among the total of 650 papers submitted before the deadline. Papers you recommend for the conference should be both NOVEL and of HIGH QUALITY (more about grading
criteria after logon).
You can find the Call for Papers for DRUID23 here: https://conference.druid.dk/Druid/?confId=66
You can access the papers assigned to you by logging on here:
https://reviewer.druid.dk/Reviewer/revFeedbackStart.xhtml?c=dkcnjkfdi2a8gmzfwo3u
All information provided in your self-declared profile has been used to identify papers that we believe fall within your broader area of competence and expertise. Please notify us immediately if you feel less than totally unbiased towards the assumed author(s)
or content of a specific paper. We also kindly ask you inform us immediately if you notice or suspect - however slightly - any kind of plagiarism, data fabrication or other violations of academic ethics in the paper(s) you are asked to review.
The review process is simple and easy in terms of effort and time required. No written report is requested. Please see the instructions upon logging on above. In order to keep our deadlines, we will need your recommendations to be submitted before April 1.
Thanks once again for agreeing to review a maximum of ten papers for DRUID23. Your assistance is crucial for a successful conference and highly appreciated!
Best wishes
Mark Lorenzen
Director, DRUID
----------------
For future reference please use the following email ID: 99358