Dear Mark and the Druid23 team. Hope you are doing well. I am writing to inform you that one of the papers assigned to me for review for Druid23 is not anonymized. Unfortunately, I was able to see the name of the authors, which violates the double-blind review process that is being followed by the conference. Its title is "User-generated content shapes judicial reasoning: Evidence from a randomized control trial on Wikipedia" and its submission number is 70383. I understand that the double-blind review process is crucial to ensure fairness and objectivity in the peer-review process, and it is essential that all papers are anonymized to avoid any bias in the evaluation of the submissions. I am confident that this was an unintentional mistake. Still, I believe it is necessary to bring it to your attention so that the required actions can be taken to rectify the situation. Thank you for your attention to this matter, and I look forward to hearing back from you. Best regards, Hamid Hamid Mazloomi *--* *Associate Professor* *Strategy and Innovation Department * *Rennes School of Business * *Tel: + 33 (0)2 99 54 63 38* *Fax: +33(0) 2 99 33 08 24* *hamid.mazloomi@esc-rennes.fr <hamid.mazloomi@esc-rennes.fr>* *2, Rue Robert d'Arbrissel - CS 76522* *35065 Rennes Cedex, France* *SSRN: **ssrn.com/author=1618150 <http://ssrn.com/author=1618150>* *Twitter: **@Hamid_Mazloomi <http://twitter.com/Hamid_Mazloomi>* On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 7:31 PM DRUID23 <druid@druid.dk> wrote:
*** EXTERNAL EMAIL, think before you click. ***
DRUID23 NOVA School of Business and Economics June 10-June 12, 2023 Email: druid@druid.dk Website: druid.dk
Dear Hamid Mazloomi,
Time has now come to select the best papers for oral presentation at the upcoming DRUID23 conference among the total of 650 papers submitted before the deadline. Papers you recommend for the conference should be both NOVEL and of HIGH QUALITY (more about grading criteria after logon).
You can find the Call for Papers for DRUID23 here: https://conference.druid.dk/Druid/?confId=66
You can access the papers assigned to you by logging on here:
https://reviewer.druid.dk/Reviewer/revFeedbackStart.xhtml?c=jgeixprvjwxkblir...
All information provided in your self-declared profile has been used to identify papers that we believe fall within your broader area of competence and expertise. Please notify us immediately if you feel less than totally unbiased towards the assumed author(s) or content of a specific paper. We also kindly ask you inform us immediately if you notice or suspect - however slightly - any kind of plagiarism, data fabrication or other violations of academic ethics in the paper(s) you are asked to review.
The review process is simple and easy in terms of effort and time required. No written report is requested. Please see the instructions upon logging on above. In order to keep our deadlines, we will need your recommendations to be submitted before April 1.
Thanks once again for agreeing to review a maximum of ten papers for DRUID23. Your assistance is crucial for a successful conference and highly appreciated!
Best wishes Mark Lorenzen Director, DRUID
---------------- For future reference please use the following email ID: 98686